• wireguard
• rsync
• zfs

Please tell me it can spell better than grammarly. That website REALLY shows its roots.

They can’t really say no to a free app

“No enterprise support” is actually scary for them. I did security, 'way back, but in Unix, and maybe that’s why we were more cool with OSS back then. Windows people love the black-box binaries and fear a lack of pricy support.

Absolute true. We mimicked bad design out there for compatibility, but then it became comfy and now cannot be changed.

Having said that, the ribbon must die. Let’s not hold MSOffice (post-97) up as the ideal for anything at all, okay?

I’ve updated enterprise Linux machines automatically for decades. The score is tens of thousands of upgrades, 1 problem I caused, 1 packaging glitch.

You don’t need to take on risky drek like flatpaks to get there. It’s one command in enterprise and you’re kinda done forever.

Glad you like your setup. I hope it works for you and you never learn the risks of flatpaks.

Please consider gitlab . Its on-prem fulfils most of your requirements, and when installed by omnibus RPM it kinda does it all for you. It’s going to be maybe 5 commands on top of a bare machine setup.

And please consider spaces and hyphens. Gluingwords togetherlike thatcan make it hard to read.

webapps

web apps

selfhost

self-host

We need a running service when a simple command will do?

How big an attack surface do you need?

You configure the VPN in the router the roku connects through.

Hey. Thanks for the update! As someone whose experience was heavily windows apart from some failed Linux attempts, your experience switching now is an excellent comparison.

Glad the story got better in the second act.

Keep the story going. Please update.

Thanks for persevering also.

Still requires docker?

not actually seen any benefit of the separation in practice.

The first time some big download hoses your root, you will be enlightened :-D

EFI
83:boot(e4fs)
8e:lvm(e4fs)
bf:zfs

This is just for /dev/sda or so, and implies non-redundant root disks because mirroring is done by the hypervisor. I’ve been 20 years doing virtualization, and I’m really starting to forget the last vestiges of my mdadm fdisk layout.

So many people in this thread have no idea why you’d want separate allocation for /home and /tmp and others. Are we missing proper mentorship?

Containerized packaging is toxic. Let them learn on their own time and not take you down with them!

dreamed everyday

every day. Two words, my dude.

go through the compile-flash-boot agonising process just to debug a config file.

Overlayfs was a thing since; what, Kernel 2.2? We had debugging and in-situ mods where required.

Is there a docker-free version due?

After 15 years? I applaud your gadgetry care and preservation.

Has anybody been able to build a statically linked binary

The question should by why you’d want to. Careful if your reply is something about ‘one binary to work on a very diverse arrangement of library pinnings’ because the next question would be ‘why would you think that’s either achievable or valuable as a goal’; and toss in a ‘why try to ship the same binary in several different repos anyway’ bonus question.

In short, if your biggest problem is how to build a binary that works everywhere, you have a lot of questions about responsible build/release processes to answer, and they will be embarrassing for you.

Evaluation of the product no longer required.

I say still use fedora; just don’t pay for it! \s