I’ll definitely uninstall brave but it makes sense why they chose it. People crying over it are being dumb. Hopefully when Firefox fixes its crashing issue it can go back to the default.
Don’t know about brave, but rolling release is much better
Rolling release? Not expecting this lol noice with brave by default
The rolling release thing isn’t for me, but I get why that model might appeal. Brave, though? Why?
Brave? Yeah…nope
Ew
can’t we make them publicly account for their decision to choose an anti LGBTQ+ browser?
Elaborate?
you have to look a long way back in time to find out, oddly enough as if you had a vendetta against a certain person
Why are you talking in riddles
do you like Brave browser?
Never used it, but given my aversion to crypto, no.
Rather more of a crpyto bro shit browser with lack of privacy implementations and bad history. No different than Apple saying they love Privacy
they disabled that by configuration and they still thought it was the best browser, odd
First I hear about them, and since Brave is the default browser I know I don’t want to know more. Smooth!
Stares in Debian Testing/Sid.
The partial unannounced updatebroke my installation, which is why I finally ditched Nobara for Bluefin
Gross.
At least they disable the monetization features of Brave but making stupid Google Meet such a hard requirement to compromise of all ethics? WTF?
well, at least they provided some rationale for switching browsers. still, it’s good thing we have bazzite.
Does the rolling release model mean Nobara is based on Fedora Rawhide now?
Damn, not sure I’m a fan of any of this. I left Arch because I didn’t want to be on Rolling release any more, and really liked what Nobara was offering for the out of the box experience.
Brave is super sketchy, and not sure about putting in yet another thing to handle updates (replacing plasma-discover and gnome-software).
I’m wondering if its worth forking it to remove some of these changes.
