Some years ago, I hosted my own matrix server for a few months. I’m an experienced self-hoster, but I remeber that Matrix was paticularly hard to host, requiring weird proxy rules, DNS adjustments, federation never worked reliably and push notifications never worked at all. I ditched the project soon because I also had no real use for it. However, I recently had some ideas where a Matrix server would be useful again. Has anyone attempted to install it recently and can tell me whether the situation has improved? Also, which server do you recommend? There still is synapse but I found it paticularly complicated to host. Dendrite is now archived and the current fork seems to be tuwunel which doesn’t seem to be under very active development.

  • Lucy :3@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    24 days ago

    Tbh I had no issues with synapse.

    The problems that persist: Very rare issues with decrypting (as I rarely encounter it, while being in encrypted chats with 150+ users, it’s not an issue for me), apart from after you changed clients, slow image loading (a bit annoying, but ok if you multitask anyway) and clients all having different feature sets (some of which you can also hackily make work in others).

  • Shimitar@downonthestreet.eu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    24 days ago

    I host my tuwunnel server and I am happy with it. The lack of a top level client is my turn down. Element X is good but still lacking, and fluffy chat is maybe better looking but more lacking.

    My matrix use case is only WhatsApp and telegram backup using the bridges, actually… So YMMV.

  • stratself@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    24 days ago
    • DNS adjustments aren’t needed if you do .well-known delegations which is easier
    • Can recommend continuwuity, it runs much better on less resources. Lacks certain features compared to Synapse but overall good
    • Notifications (and read markers) depend on client-specific black magic to work
    • Federation do sometimes silent-fail completely, you can reset continuwuity’s cache + restart when that happens. But full room history convergence needs patience
    • Don’t join large rooms unless your server can handle the load
    • Don’t host public rooms without modbots

    The many small bugs make Matrix still bad - I wouldn’t recommend a non-tech user unless accompanied by a 24/7 admin. It is trying to improve but very slow because of reasons

  • jevans ⁂@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    24 days ago

    It’s been a solid tool for hosting just for myself to bridge all the different platforms/protocols that people want to talk to me using, but there is no way I would recommend it to anyone else. I don’t know if it will ever get to a point where it works well enough for me to recommend. If you do want to host a server though, I strongly recommend matrix docker ansible deploy to do so.

  • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    24 days ago

    If you want a conduwuit sucessor, I’d choose the continuwuity project over tuwunel. The legitimacy as the sucessor is mainly self-proclaimed, and continuwuity is a community effort. The entire thing is kind of a shitshow, though. If you want to do it like 99% of people, make friends with Synapse.

    I think what you describe still holds true. You need a few correct DNS entries and an open port. Once you want VoIP, some more ports and a TURN server will be necessary. And that one took me some effort, but the server itself (including federation) was well within my comfort zone. And I run continuwuity these days because Synapse wastes way too much resources for what I do and their other efforts went nowhere. But I’m not sure about the future of those smaller Matrix server projects.

    And if you don’t like Matrix or can’t get it to run, maybe try something like XMPP.

    • Helix 🧬@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      If you want a conduwuit sucessor, I’d choose the continuwuity project over tuwunel.

      You realise that sounds insane, right?

      • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        24 days ago

        Sure, I believe that is supposed to be uWu or maybe some kind of puppy talk. It’s certainly originally started by June, who turned conduit (which is a sane name) into conduwuit.

        I figured I’ve lost all shame anyway, back when we discussed nerd topics in the school bus or the 5 'o clock train, like Linux lore, anime, Star Trek concepts and technobabble. I mean people were staring and I’m aware of that, but I’ve really lost all F*'s to give. And that turns me into the person who I am today, and I’ll happily write sentences like the one above. Or still talk about Star Trek in a crowded train. And these days it’s the mycelial network and that really makes people question my sanity. 🫠

      • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        24 days ago

        We’ve had the discussion a while back here in selfhosted. You can find it here: https://awful.systems/post/5029223

        Main points: Continued drama around people, and tuwunel is tied to a single, (paid) developer and I figure once there’s anything wrong with that, tuwunel might die instantly. While continuwuity is a community effort and maybe that’s a bit more sustainable. Though I don’t own any crystal ball and I don’t know how things will turn out.

    • qtip@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      I switched from IRC to matrix in 2018 specifically because I found mobile difficult.

      I used the suggestion in your linked document by running irssi in a tmux session on a VPS I paid for, then using a bridge to an app on my phone. I found the experience to be cumbersome even for someone like myself (and even then irssi required reboots or else it would lose performance over time).

      I wanted to use IRC for a family chat, but I couldn’t possibly convince my friends and family to go through the same client setup as I did.

      In my opinion there are use cases that either IRC or Matrix would be preferred over the other (not to mention other self hosted communication software).

  • Helix 🧬@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    24 days ago

    I recently shut down my server because it’s a high traffic, high risk software. You should have an eye on it, I’d say at least half an hour every week…

  • Samsy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    24 days ago

    I use conduit. And really happy with it. Since I use 3 bridges the compose.yml is a mess. It works really nice. The sliding feature boosts all media files. But there is always something broken or misconfigured. Actually my WhatsApp bridge blocks all mediafiles and I was too busy to fix it already.

  • verstra@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    24 days ago

    My matrix server is nearing 5 years old. I have federation disabled, because I don’t need that - we are using it as a family chat. sqlite database I’m using is now 2GB, but other than that it is working great.

    I do acknowledge that I’m not leveraging the things matrix is designed for (federation, e2e encryption), but to be honest, it’s not really good at that.

  • underline960@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    24 days ago

    Damn. That sucks. (Edit: Referring to the comments saying Matrix is dead and dying.)

    I get that IRC and XMPP are more stable and built around federation from the ground up, but… they’re not Discord replacements.

    That was IMHO, the point of Matrix/Element.

    Tell me if I’m wrong, but a significant part of a network’s resilience is the number of nodes and users.

    Without a glowup or some kind of repackaging, IRC/XMPP are doomed to stay niche.

    • pedz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      24 days ago

      I had the same experience as OP when I tried Matrix a few years ago. No hate on it but it was not easy and I gave up because I already had a simple IRC setup that’s working for me and my friends.

      Some IRC clients are now web based and it’s been enough to keep a few of my friends there instead of Discord. We use The Lounge. It can keep a history, display images, videos, play mp3s, and show previews of most URLs. Like, we can simply copy/paste images into a channel and they are uploaded on the server and displayed in the chat. There’s also push notifications and it’s mobile friendly.

      Convos also does something like this. Apparently it can also do video chat but I’ve never got it to work.

      I’ve recently been thinking about giving Matrix another try but I’m pretty sure my friends are going to stay on “modern” IRC anyway.

    • Atherel@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      Well Discord started as a replacement for IRC and TeamSpeak/Mumble, then began to add more and more things and got used as a forum replacement and everything went down the hill. Why not going back to the roots? We had fucking IRC scripts for matchmaking in Q3CTF.

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        24 days ago

        Discord has quite a few good features that IRC doesn’t. I will agree that it being used as a replacement for a forum, while also being unsearchable, is amazingly stupid. However, it’s used by almost everyone for a reason, and to ignore that (if you were to develop and alternative) ensures you won’t succeed. Yeah, we don’t need every feature from Discord, but easy voice/text/video chats, image/file sharing, and all the other useful things are required. Yeah, we can probably lose the emotes and crap and be fine.

      • underline960@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        24 days ago

        I wouldn’t mind going back to IRC roots if it could be made more user friendly and integrate voice and video chat.

        Good UX/UI goes a long way to make it so non-technical people can join and strengthen the network.

    • curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      Xmpp supports group chat, 1:1 messaging, you’ve got webtrc support for voice/video, and its extensible.

      Jingle even has screen sharing (and I think a WIP remote control function).

      What is missing from xmpp?

      • underline960@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        24 days ago

        Technically, nothing.

        In practice, who do you know that’s using it and doesn’t run Arch, by the way?


        My point isn’t that IRC/XMPP aren’t technically capable.

        It’s that they’re not designed for non-technical users.

        I want corporate social media to die. Mastodon and Piefed are far from killing the beast, but they’ve made the more progress than most projects have seen in a long time.

        I want corporate messaging to die. Matrix is far from killing the beast, but for a little while, at least it was trying.

        • curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          24 days ago

          In practice, who do you know that’s using it and doesn’t run Arch, by the way?

          Well I mostly run Debian, but I do have arch on a machine so maybe I don’t count.

          It’s that they’re not designed for non-technical users.

          Have to agree there, it takes some effort if you’re setting it up for friends and family.

        • poVoq@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          24 days ago

          Quicksy and Prav apps allow you to easily signup via SMS verification like WhatApp etc. Super easy and the app works like Whatsapp, completely usable for non technical users (much more so than any Matrix client).

          And Snikket is an super easy all in one solution for running a XMPP based small group server with invite based onboarding. Also completely non-technical user compatible.

    • Suzune@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      This is quite annoying. When will devs learn to tell people to resolve the problem instead of just showing a pointless error messages?

      • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        23 days ago

        afaik those errors can’t really be solved by users. I mean other than using an up to date client and server.

        • Suzune@ani.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          23 days ago

          If users cannot do anything because all encryption keys are lost, then they need to know that and also how to avoid the situation in the future.

          I think it’s not a bug. It’s simply no one online who can share a decryption key.

          • Jade@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            21 days ago

            Matrix encryption keys don’t need other people online - they get queued up as messages for each device you have.

          • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            21 days ago

            its often a bug, because the clients who have the keys don’t know they should retry sending.

            but also it’s all been fixed a year ago as I know. I don’t usually use dm rooms and public ones are not encrypted, so I wouldn’t know if I didn’t read about it.

    • Jade@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      I’ve only seen this message in the last months where different servers are having network issues and can’t talk

      • hard_zero1@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        24 days ago

        I’ve last seen it last month. And I have an old chat, where FluffyChat and (“old”) Element show all messages by now, but Element X can’t decrypt many and both Elements report that they can’t guarantee the authenticity of many messages (even my own). For a long time, my chat partner could only read messages I sent via FluffyChat but not those sent by Element. I have not checked if that is still the case.

        • Jade@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          23 days ago

          “can’t guarantee the authenticity of this message” just means it was restored from backup. In the same vein, if you can decrypt a message in any client, it should upload the keys to the message backup so it can be decrypted on other clients, even ones that haven’t logged in.

        • oranki@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          23 days ago

          Some months ago, I had UTD issues with Element X too. My hs has been up for some years, and the devs claimed they had done a lot to fix UTDs.

          I was about to bring the server down, but as a last resort decided to log out all but one Element web session which was able to decrypt the messages and try resetting the key backup. Haven’t had any UTD issues since then.

          Maybe worth a try.