Hello everyone, hope you are doing great.
I am not sure if my question goes here, but this was my best guess. Apologies if I am wrong.
So, I have been using the mesh network offered by NordVPN alongside with their VPN subscription to sync some folders between my phone (Android) and my laptop (Linux Mint). This was great because I remember not being able to use Tailscale and VPN at the same time in the past, at least not on my phone.
Now they are dropping Meshnet support in December, so I am trying to figure out if there’s any way I can still run NordVPN and a Meshnet, or if I have to discard one.
If you know of any alternative, please let me know!
It might not be what you’re looking for, but tailscale offers end points where you can use mulvad vpn in conjunction with your tailscale network, might be worth looking into! I use it and it works great.
Obligatory due to the sub we’re in. I don’t believe tailscale falls into the space of “self hosted”. You’d need to set up your own wireguard server for that.
I thought of that, my problem is that I have another year of NordVPN subscription paid, and I don’t want to waste it. But lesson learned, no more long subscriptions.
Thanks for the clarification!
i know there were a lot of recommendations for tailscale/headscale (and they’ll keep coming because it’s the current market darling) but i’ve found netbird to be more ergonomic for my needs.
+1 for Headscale.
I’m not familiar with NordVPN Meshnet but I wanted to chime in that you can use Tailscale with a VPN, but you’ll have to do some routing work between the Tailscale network interface and the VPN one. I do this on a VPS.
Don’t do this as it defeats the point of Tailscale
Not really. I use the exit node to forward my “default” traffic through the VPN but I still use tunnels between my end devices too. My wife uses it to print documents from work and hell, I even shut off a lot of services on my LAN and made them Tailscale-only just as a way to force encryption (unnecessarily).
The problem is that it likely will break NAT traversal which means no direct connections.
Tailscale already has VPN integrations. I would recommend that you use that instead.
Tailscale only supports Mullvad VPN and when you do use it you’re stuck with its DNS server. It’s a super basic option and doesn’t allow for much customization.
On the exit node you should be able to setup routing so that traffic goes though a VPN route.
In the end though I honestly don’t see much of a use case for VPNs
So you’re just chiming in that people shouldn’t use it because you don’t see the use case for VPNs?
