I recently took up Bazzite from mint and I love it! After using it for a few days I found out it was an immutable distro, after looking into what that is I thought it was a great idea. I love the idea of getting a fresh image for every update, I think for businesses/ less tech savvy people it adds another layer of protection from self harm because you can’t mess with the root without extra steps.

For anyone who isn’t familiar with immutable distros I attached a picture of mutable vs immutable, I don’t want to describe it because I am still learning.

My question is: what does the community think of it?

Do the downsides outweigh the benefits or vice versa?

Could this help Linux reach more mainstream audiences?

Any other input would be appreciated!

  • Nibodhika@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    21 days ago

    what does the community think of it?

    Everyone has their own opinion, personally I think they’re a great idea and have lots of great applications. But just like rolling vs non-rolling release it’s a personal and application dependant choice.

    Do the downsides outweigh the benefits or vice versa?

    Again, depends, for my personal computer I wouldn’t use it because I think it could get complicated to get specific things to work, but for closed hardware like the Deck or even a fairly stable desktop used as a gaming system it’s perfect.

    Could this help Linux reach more mainstream audiences?

    It could, it can also hamper it because people might start to try solutions that only work until next boot and not understanding why, or having problems getting some special hardware to work (more than it would be a mutable distro). But there is a great counter to this which is that once it’s running it will be very difficult to break by user error.

    At the end of the day I think it’s a cool technology but that people should know what they’re getting into, just like when choosing rolling vs non-rolling distro, it’s not about what’s better, but what suits your needs best.

  • vga@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    22 days ago

    I have investigated the idea and came to the conclusion that immutable distros are essentially a research project. They attempt to advance the state-of-art a slight bit but the cost is currently too great.

    Perhaps somebody will some day create something that’s worth switching to. But I don’t think that has happened yet, or is happening with any of the current distros. Silverblue might become that with enough polish, but I feel that to get that amount of polish, they would have to make Silverblue the 1st class citizen, i.e. the default install of Fedora.

  • Lettuce eat lettuce@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    22 days ago

    Immutable distros are great for applications where you want uniformity for users and protections against users who are a little too curious for their own good.

    SteamOS is a perfect use case. You don’t want users easily running scripts on their Steam Decks to install god knows what and potentially wreck their systems, then come to Valve looking for a fix.

    Immutable distros solve that issue. Patches and updates for the OS roll out onto effectively identical systems, and if something does break, the update will fail instead of the system. So users will still have a fully functional Steam Deck.

    If you’re not very technical, or you aren’t a power user and packaged apps like Flatpaks are available for all your software, then go for it. I prefer to tinker under the hood with my computers, but I also understand and except the risk that creates.

    Immutable distros are a valuable part of a larger, vibrant Linux ecosystem IMO.

    • chunkystyles@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 days ago

      Immutable are the ultimate tinkerer’s distros. It’s just a different way of tinkering. True tinkering in immutable means creating your own image from the base image and that allows you to add or remove packages, change configs, services, etc.

      Example: you create your own image. You decide you want to try something, but you’re being cautious. So you create a new image based on your first with your changes. You try it out and you don’t like it or it doesn’t work for some reason, you can just revert back to you other image.

      Another thing worth mentioning, with these distros, you can switch between images at will. I’m new to Linux as my daily driver desktop OS, and I’ve rebased three times. It’s really cool to be able to do that.

      • priapus@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        22 days ago

        Don’t know why this would be downvoted. Atomic distro’s are a tinkerers paradise, as all of it can be done fearlessly. I can make stupid changes to configurations that I don’t understand on NixOS, then when things break, simply revert the git commit and rebuild. (Or reboot to the last build if I broke it bad enough).

        • chunkystyles@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          22 days ago

          Who knows. People are passionate about Linux. And downvoting takes no effort. And people downvote stuff randomly.

    • Norah (pup/it/she)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      22 days ago

      So Bazzite basically is an immutable 3rd-party SteamOS. It was originally designed for handhelds (though has desktop images now) and includes the Steam Deck’s gamemode package. That means it has the same interface, but working on a Legion Go or an Ally X. If anyone here has* any of those three you should seriously check it out!

      The other thing as well is that more often than not, the update will succeed and you won’t figure out until the next boot that something is wrong. However, Bazzite has a rollback tool so you can just change back to the previous image, reboot again and get to gaming.

      That’s the best reason for immutable for gaming IMO. I don’t want to be fucking around with the OS when I’m in the mood to game. Being able to quickly rollback and jump into things in ~10 minutes or less is how it should be.

  • lnxtx (xe/xem/xyr)@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    22 days ago

    Immutable, doesn’t mean extreme secure. It’s a false sense of security.
    It could be more secure.
    But during a runtime, it is possible to overwrite operational memory, mask some syscalls, etc.

    That’s my 3 cents.

    • Rusty@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 days ago

      I didn’t know that inflation can affect idiomatic expressions.

    • vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 days ago

      it doesn’t allow changes to stuff that needs root access to change. If you have root access you can do anything, including switching images. It is not more secure. It’s not less either

    • Chewy@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 days ago

      Fully agreed. On almost any atomic distro, /home/user is writeable like usual, so any attacker is able to persist itself by editing ~/.bashrc and putting a binary somewhere.

    • xylogx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      21 days ago

      Secure can also mean more resilient. The infosec C-I-A triangle has three legs. Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability. Immutable distros are more resilient and thus offer better availability in the face of attacks or accidents.

  • Grangle1@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    22 days ago

    I personally vastly prefer mutable distros for my own system, but I understand the appeal for those who like them. As long as mutable distros remain an option I don’t mind immutable distros.

  • KrispeeIguana@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    22 days ago

    It’s definitely great for the mainstream. Think of Linus Sebastian who has somehow broken every OS except for SteamOS.

    It’s not great for me who uses Arch Linux btw with the expectation that if the system doesn’t break on its own, then I will break it myself.

      • KrispeeIguana@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        19 days ago

        He can be an asshole, but I believe finding bugs is part of his job.

        Would you rather have him find them and complain to a community who might know what they could be, or someone else who will just complain and buy a MacBook instead?

  • noodles@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    22 days ago

    Secure != stable Immutable distros aren’t always more secure but rather more stable and hard to break Also btw nixos can apply updates without rebooting

  • Magiilaro@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    22 days ago

    I am a huge fan of immutable distributions, not for my personal daily driver but for secondary systems like my living room/home theater PC.

  • kibiz0r@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    22 days ago

    NixOS is kinda the best of both worlds, because it does everything in a way that is compatible with an immutable fs, but it doesn’t force you into abiding by immutability yourself.

    You can always opt into immutability by using Impermanence, but I’ve never seen any reason to.

    Edit: That said, the syntax has a steep learning curve and there are tons of annoying edge cases that spawn out of the measures it takes to properly isolate things. It can be a lot to micromanage, so if you’d rather just use your system more than tinker with it, it may not be a good fit.

  • rumba@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    21 days ago

    Then you have NixOS, which is declarative, and fairly immutable.

    You don’t have to reboot to make changes, but you can’t just run unlinked binaries either.

    You can’t do things like edit your hosts table or modify the FS for cron jobs. The application store is unwritable, but you can sync new apps into it .

    You have to make changes to the config file and run a rebuild as root.

    • nomen_dubium@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      21 days ago

      just for clarity: you can modify stuff like hosts or cron jobs but it’d get overwritten iirc? you can also make the change in the config and have it persist (reproducibility being the main point, not disallowing you to edit your files)

      • rumba@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        21 days ago

        No, that file is located in the nix store and linked back, If you become root and try to edit /etc/hosts It will complain that you cannot edit the linked file.

        If you go and try to edit the store directly you will meet the same kind of dead ends because /nix/store is a ro bind mount

        With enough root access, time and persistence you could eventually unwrap its flavor of immutability which is why I said mostly immutable. Compared to most operating systems where you can just slip a quick edit into a cron job it’s leagues ahead.

  • Integrate777@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    22 days ago

    I heard both flatpak and immutability are obstacles to developers. How bad is it really?

    I’ve had NixOS absolutely refuse to run some compiler toolchain I depended upon that should’ve been dead simple on other distros, I’m really hesitant to try anything that tries to be too different anymore.

    • priapus@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      22 days ago

      NixOS likely only refused to run it because you weren’t running it in the Nix way. That’s not a jab or anything, Nix has a huge learning curve and requires doing a lot differently. You’re supposed to use devshells whenever doing development. If you want something to just work, you use a container.

      Whatever issue you ran into most likely had nothing to do with NixOS being immutable, and was probably caused by the non standard filesystem hierarchy, which prevents random dynamically linked binaries from running.

      I’ve never heard of flatpak and immutability being obstacles to developers, in fact I generally hear the opposite. Bluefin is primarily targeted at developers, and some apps, like Bottles, will only officially support the flatpak distribution because of the simplicity and benefits it brings over standard distro packaging.

    • ivn@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 days ago

      I’ve had NixOS absolutely refuse to run some compiler toolchain I depended upon that should’ve been dead simple on other distros, I’m really hesitant to try anything that tries to be too different anymore.

      Yes, some toolchain expect you to run pre-compiled dynamically linked binaries. These won’t work on NixOS, you need to either find a way to install the binary from nix and force the toolchain to use it or run patchelf on it somehow.

    • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 days ago

      It would be a problem without distrobox. Since that gives you a normal, mutable OS on top, you don’t even notice the immutability.

  • Hemingways_Shotgun@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    22 days ago

    I don’t mind flatpaks in a pinch, but having to use them for literally every app on my computer is an unreasonable amount of bloat.

    • IrritableOcelot@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      21 days ago

      The barrier for me is that I use a lot of apps which require native messaging for inter-program communication (keepass browser, citation managers talking to Libreoffice, etc.), and the portal hasn’t been implemented yet. Its been stuck in PR comment hell for years. Looks like its getting close, but flatpak-only is a hard no go for me until then.

      Even after that, I would worry about doing some Dev work on atomic distros, and I worry about running into other hard barriers in the future.

      • Hemingways_Shotgun@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        22 days ago

        Not when every app decides to use a different point version of the same damn platform.

        "Hello Mr. Application. I see you’d like to use the Freedesktop-SDK 23.08.27

        “Oh…well hello other application. What’s this? You want to use Freedesktop-SDK 24.08.10? Well…I guess so…”

        Edited to add: Yes, I know that flatpaks will upgrade to use updated platforms. But it doesn’t automatically remove the old one, forcing you to have to run flatpak remove --unused every week just to keep your drive clean. That’s hardly user friendly for the average person.

        • fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          20 days ago

          I had a systemd unit that ran it weekly after the update one ran. I feel like the default behavior though should be automatic purge old unused runtimes though too. I don’t see why that wouldn’t the case to me.

          I’ve even gone so far as wanting to force run time changes underneath the packs because of Caves and such, but thats my niche and puts security over function.

          Definitely not a free lunch sys admin wise, but it is still a marked improvement over native apps 98% of the time for me.

        • SpatchyIsOnline@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          22 days ago

          The average person has a 1tb+ drive and doesn’t care about a few hundred megabytes of bloat in a partition they will never look at. If someone is switching from Windows, every app having its dependencies self contained is mostly normal anyway (aside from the occasional system provided dll). The only people likely to care about removing old flatpak platforms are the kind of people who don’t mind running the command to remove them.

  • lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    21 days ago

    Since the idea is that the “root partition” is immutable, serious question:

    How do you fix a hardware config issue or a distro packaging / provision issue in an immutable distro?

    Several times in my Linux history I’ve found that, for example, I need to remove package-provided files from the ALSA files in /usr/share/alsa in order for the setup to work with my particular chipset (which has a hardware bug). Other times, I’ve found that even if I set up a custom .XCompose file in my $HOME, some applications insist on reading the Compose files in /usr/share/X11/locale instead, which means I need to be able to edit or remove those files. In order to add custom themes, I need to be able to add them to /usr/share/{icons,themes}, since replicating those themes for each $HOME in the system is a notorious waste of space and not all applications seem to respect /usr/local/share. Etc.

    Unless I’m mistaken on how immutable systems work, I’m not sure immutable systems are really useful to someone who actually wants to or needs to power user Linux, or customize past the “branding locking” that environments like Gnome have been aiming for for like a decade.

    • Kanedias@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      18 days ago

      My guess would be: have an additional overlay filesystem on top of your immutable root and apply all your fixes to it.

      • lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        17 days ago

        On the one hand sounds sensible, on the other hand I wonder if that’s possible when wanting to apply things that need to take place as early in boot as possible (eg.: modprobe options for a module, apparmor profiles, …).

  • Guenther_Amanita 🍄@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    22 days ago
    • You can still apply updates live, e.g. on Bazzite (Fedora Atomic) with the --apply-live tag (or however it’s spelled).
    • The root partition isn’t read only per se, but you have to change the upstream image itself instead of the one booted right now. You can use the uBlue-Builder for example to make your own custom Bazzite spin just for you if you want.
    • Both aren’t inherently secure or insecure. It’s harder to brick your system, yeah, for sure, but you can still fuck up some partitions or get malware. It’s just better because everything is transparently identifiable (ostree works like git), saved (fallback images), containerised and reproducible.
    • And you can still install system software, e.g. by layering it via rpm-ostree. Or use rootful containers in Distrobox and keep using apt or Pacman in there.