• lnxtx (xe/xem/xyr)@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    28 days ago

    Maybe not shit, but exotic at that time, year 2012.
    The first Raspberry Pi, model B 512 MB RAM, with an external 40 GB 3.5" HDD connected to USB 2.0.

    It was running ARM Arch BTW.

    Next, cheap, second hand mini desktop Asus Eee Box.
    32 bit Intel Atom like N270, max. 1 GB RAM DDR2 I think.
    Real metal under the plastic shell.
    Could even run without active cooling (I broke a fan connector).

  • dmtalon@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    28 days ago

    I’m sure a lot of people’s self hosting journey started on junk hardware… “try it out”, followed by “oh this is cool” followed by “omg I could do this, that and that” followed by dumping that hand-me-down garbage hardware you were using for something new and shiny specifically for the server.

    My unRAID journey was this exactly. I now have a 12 hot/swap bay rack mounted case, with a Ryzan 9 multi core, ECC ram, but it started out with my ‘old’ PC with a few old/small HDDs

  • seathru@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    28 days ago

    Yup. Gateway E-475M. It has trouble transcoding some plex streams, but it keeps chugging along. $5 well spent.

  • NickwithaC@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    28 days ago

    4 gigs of RAM is enough to host many singular projects - your own backup server or VPN for instance. It’s only if you want to do many things simultaneously that things get slow.

    • lka1988@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      28 days ago

      My cluster ranges from 4th gen to 8th gen Intel stuff. 8th gen is the newest I’ve ever had (until I built a 5800X3D PC).

      I’ve seen people claiming 9th gen is “ancient”. Like…ok moneybags.

  • jws_shadotak@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    28 days ago

    I was for a while. Hosted a LOT of stuff on an i5-4690K overclocked to hell and back. It did its job great until I replaced it.

    Now my servers don’t lag anymore.

    EDIT: CPU usage was almost always at max. I was just redlining that thing for ~3 years. Cooling was a beefy Noctua air cooler so it stayed at ~60 C. An absolute power house.

  • Revv@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    28 days ago

    7 websites, Jellyfin for 6 people, Nextcloud, CRM for work, email server for 3 domains, NAS, and probably some stuff I’ve forgotten on a $4 computer from a tiny thrift store in BFE Kansas. I’d love to upgrade, but I’m always just filled with joy whenever I think of that little guy just chugging along.

      • Revv@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        27 days ago

        It does fine. It’s an i5-6500 running CPU transcoding only. Handles 2-3 concurrent 1080p streams just fine. Sometimes there’s a little buffering if there’s transcoding going on. I try to keep my files at 1080p for storage reasons though. This thing’s not going to handle 4k transcoding very well, but it does okay if you don’t expect too much from it.

        • PieMePlenty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          27 days ago

          I’m skeptical that you are doing much video transcoding anyway. 1080p is supported on must devices now, and h264 is best buddies with 1080p content - a codec supported even on washing machines. Audio may be transcoded more often.

          • RogueBanana@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            27 days ago

            Most of my content is h265 and av1 so I assume they are also facing a similar issue. I usually use the jellyfin app on PC or laptop so not an issue but my family members usually use the old TV which doesn’t support it.

            • PieMePlenty@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              27 days ago

              AV1 is definitely a showstopper a lot of the time indeed. H265 I would expect to see more on 2k or 4k content (though native support is really high anyway). My experience so far has been seeing transcoding done only becuase the resolution is unsupported when I try watching 4k videos on an older 1080p only chromecast.

              • N0x0n@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                26 days ago

                What do you mean by showstopper? I only encode my shows into AV1/opus and I never had any transcoding happening on any of my devices.

                It’s well supported on any recent Browser compared to x264/x265… specially 10bit encodes. And software decoding is nearly present on any recent device.

                Dunno about 4k though, I haven’t the necessary screen resolution to play any 4k content… But for 1080p, AV1 is the way to go IMO.

                • Free open/source
                • Any browser supported
                • Better compression
                • Same objective quality with lower bitrate
                • A lot of cool open source project arround AV1

                It has it’s own quirks for sure (like every codec) but it’s far from a bad codec. I’m not a specialist on the subject but after a few months of testing/comparing/encoding… I settled with AV1 because it was comparative better than x264/x265.

                • PieMePlenty@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  26 days ago

                  Showstopper in the sense that it may not play natively and require transcoding. While x264 has pretty much universal support, AV1 does not… at least not on some of my devices. I agree that it is a good encoder and the way forward but its not the best when using older devices. My experience has been with Chromecast with Google TV. Looks like google only added AV1 support in their newest Google TV Streamer (late 2024 device).