For me, it was perhaps simple-scan, a very simple and efficient GUI to scan documents. I used it with my Brother printer / scanner and it works like a charm. Especially since I do not scan stuff often, so a program with more complex UI would have the effect that I forget how to use it until the next time.

    • Zak@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’m pretty neutral about the mere existence of software I’m not interested in using.

      • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I think MS assumes no one will use it. But having Linux builds of some of their software enhances their “MS loves Linux” marketing.

        Teams is another example.

          • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Fair – what I meant was more about the Teams binary kind of not being needed at all (you can use the web version without it). So having a Linux binary explicitly just seems a little weird, marketing aside.