• webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    20 days ago

    Unrelated but how do people feel about the ai images when used for something like this.

    The font is very telling for being DallE

    • HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      19 days ago

      People would be less mad if you straight up used a stock image with a watermark so I don’t understand why people go out of their way to use AI when they know people will comment on it and it will detract from the point of the article.

      Also, using AI in the thumbnail makes people automatically assume you’re using AI in the text as well. And if you’re not doing that, why would you lessen the perceived value of your writing by making it seem like you are?

      It just seems pointless and actively harms your actual goals because people will get hung up on the fact that you used AI and ignore your actual valid points. Especially when you’re writing about open source projects when most people interested in open source are vehemently anti-AI, it really just shows you don’t know your target audience.

      • subtext@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        19 days ago

        While I mostly agree with you (and 100% on it distracting from the article), I think you’re not thinking about image rights.

        If you’re a serious blogger with a good sized blog, a lawsuit or DMCA or otherwise is potentially a killer outcome of using an image you don’t 100% sure have the rights to. With AI, you can be 100% sure you can use the image however you want, without any repercussions. I’d imagine that’s huge in the considerations for a blogger.