• SolarPunker@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    Every city should host main public web servicies for its citizens, each one as an instance of a complex system, that’s how anarchy works.

    • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      That quickly becomes a tragedy of the commons. The city residents pay for it but how do you verify “citizenship”?

      • lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        If you mean citizenship as being associated to the city whose hosting services you are using, yhe power or water bill pointed at your name and residence should be able to do that. Now, if you want that plus anonimity, the only practical option I can think of for a city-wide physical campaign is some sort of GPG Signature Meetup (“signature party”).

        • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 days ago

          yhe power or water bill pointed at your name and residence

          Many people live in cities without owning their house. So they never see those bills. Renters are usually two levels away from the actual owner. Then there are all the people who live and work in cities but aren’t official renters.

    • th3raid0r@tucson.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      Hi! This is what I’m trying to do with tucson.social. Wish the city would get back to me. I don’t want to own/operate Tucson.social alone perpetually. Lol.

      It would allow me to expand to a lot more community services outside of social media, chat, and Meetup platforms.

      There’s dozens of us! Dozens!