Some services run really good behind a reverse proxy on 443, but some others can really become an hassle… And sometimes just opening other ports would be easier than to try configuring everything to work through 443.

An example that comes to my mind is SSH, yeah you can use SSLH to forward requests coming from 443 to 22, but it’s so much easier to just leave 22 open…

Now, for SSH, if you have certificate authentication or a strong password, I think you can feel quite safe, but what about other random ports? What risks I’m exposing my server to if I open some of them when needed for a service? Is the effort of trying to pass everything through 443/80 worth it?

  • ryokimball@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 hours ago

    If you are trying to access several different services through the internet to your home network, you are better off setting up a home VPN then trying to manage multiple public facing services. The more you publish directly to the public, the more difficult it is to keep up with everything; It is likely needlessly expanding your threat exposure. Plus you never know when a new exploit gets published against any of the services you have available.

    • Dagnet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Self hosted newbie here. What if those services are docker containers? Wouldn’t the threat be isolated from the rest of the machine?

      • oddlyqueer@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 hours ago

        it’s an extra hurdle, but it’s far from a guaranteed barrier. There’s a whole class of exploits called container escapes (or hypervisor escapes if you’re dealing with old-school VMs) that specifically focus on escalating an attack from a compromised container into whatever machine is hosting the container.

      • non_burglar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Is your container isolated from your internal network?

        If I were to compromise your container, I’d immediately pivot to other systems on your private network.

        Why do the difficult thing of breaking out of a container when there’s a good chance I can use the credentials I got breaking in to your container to access other systems on your network?

      • Technus@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 hours ago

        No. Docker containers aren’t a full sandbox. There’s a number of exploits that can break out of a container and gain root access to the host.

        • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Yes and no

          Breaking out of docker in a real life context would require either a massive misconfiguration or a major security vulnerability. Chances are you aren’t going to have much in the way of lateral movement but it is always good to have defense in depth.

          • Technus@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 hours ago

            If someone’s self-hosting, I’d be willing to bet they don’t have the same hardened config or isolation that a cloud provider would.