CodyIT@programming.dev to Linux@lemmy.ml · 28 days agoThe Linux Kernel Looks To "Bite The Bullet" In Enabling Microsoft C Extensionswww.phoronix.comexternal-linkmessage-square11fedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down10
arrow-up10arrow-down1external-linkThe Linux Kernel Looks To "Bite The Bullet" In Enabling Microsoft C Extensionswww.phoronix.comCodyIT@programming.dev to Linux@lemmy.ml · 28 days agomessage-square11fedilink
minus-squaremina86@lemmy.wtflinkfedilinkarrow-up0·28 days agoMinor correction: Unnamed structs and unions (so your second example) are not part of C. They are GNU extensions.
minus-squareMinekPo1 [it/she]@lemmygrad.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up0·edit-227 days ago“ANSI C” by Kernighan and Ritchie disagrees , including that syntax (note : retranslation from Polish as that’s the language my copy is in) : A8.3 […] struct-union-specifier: , union-struct identifier ₒₚₜ { compound-declaration-list } , union-struct identifier […] Specifiers of structures or unions with [a compound declaration] list, but with no label [identifier], creates a unique type; it may only be referred to in the declaration in which it is part.
minus-squareObin@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up0·edit-227 days agoUnless I’m misunderstanding something, I’m pretty sure they’ve been standardized in C11. Also mentioned here.
Minor correction: Unnamed structs and unions (so your second example) are not part of C. They are GNU extensions.
“ANSI C” by Kernighan and Ritchie disagrees , including that syntax (note : retranslation from Polish as that’s the language my copy is in) :
Unless I’m misunderstanding something, I’m pretty sure they’ve been standardized in C11. Also mentioned here.