This war is very close to my heart and I’ve been able to contribute some network capacity to pressure Russian servers, without any effect to other services I host, using my RPi4.

I added this entry to my docker-compose.yml and it fetched the targets and started spamming their servers (logs are in Ukranian).

services:
  mhddos_proxy:
    image: ghcr.io/porthole-ascend-cinnamon/mhddos_proxy
    restart: unless-stopped
    environment:
      - TZ=Asia/Tokyo
    deploy:
      mode: replicated
      replicas: 2

You may think it is “unethical” to disturb services, but I’m sure you understand who is the aggressor, what is at stake here and this is a completely free way to be on the right side of history.

More information here: https://bsky.app/profile/itarmy-ua.bsky.social

I am not related to the project, I just contribute the little I can.

  • theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    27 days ago

    I am aware of how this works

    No, you are absolutely not aware of how this works. This is a blatant felony. Its like thinking you can’t be convicted for murder because there’s nothing “fundamentally” illegal about shooting a gun.

    • TotallyHumanPinkySwear@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      27 days ago

      I think there is a misunderstanding: I am not the one carrying out the attack in this instance, I only lend some CPU cycles to a coordinated attack. The bandwidth I contribute is insignificant (I mean… a RPi and the impact to my own services is not noticeable). The attack is only effective with lots of people with the same ideals.

      I think the gun analogy does not really work here: you cannot be held accountable for creating any part of a gun, in case of a murder.

      • theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        26 days ago

        I think the gun analogy does not really work here: you cannot be held accountable for creating any part of a gun, in case of a murder.

        You’re not making the gun, the programmers that wrote the DDoS program did. You’re firing it.

        It’s more like, you and a bunch of your friends murder by getting together and flinging the victim with rubber bands until the victim actually dies. Just because all you did was fling a small percentage of the rubber bands and that wouldn’t have killed the victim on your own doesn’t change the fact that you participated in and committed a murder. Legal systems do not have loopholes that allow you to commit crimes like this. They only have loopholes for the ultra wealthy.

      • slazer2au@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        27 days ago

        I am not the one carrying out the attack in this instance, I only lend some CPU cycles firearms to a coordinated attack.

        Intent is the thing you are missing. You know the end result of your actions. That is why this action is illegal in civilised countries.

        I think the gun analogy does not really work here: you cannot be held accountable for creating any part of a gun, in case of a murder.

        It absolutely applies, but you are not making the gun are you? You are handing a working firearm with ammo to someone you know will do something illegal.
        If I borrowed my friends firearm and said I’m going to the range, that is a normal thing. If I said I’m going to Bondi Beach with it, that is a cause for concern and why people get caught up in accessories charges.