This war is very close to my heart and I’ve been able to contribute some network capacity to pressure Russian servers, without any effect to other services I host, using my RPi4.

I added this entry to my docker-compose.yml and it fetched the targets and started spamming their servers (logs are in Ukranian).

services:
  mhddos_proxy:
    image: ghcr.io/porthole-ascend-cinnamon/mhddos_proxy
    restart: unless-stopped
    environment:
      - TZ=Asia/Tokyo
    deploy:
      mode: replicated
      replicas: 2

You may think it is “unethical” to disturb services, but I’m sure you understand who is the aggressor, what is at stake here and this is a completely free way to be on the right side of history.

More information here: https://bsky.app/profile/itarmy-ua.bsky.social

I am not related to the project, I just contribute the little I can.

  • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    27 days ago

    Running something like this will put a big target on your back. I hope you have your network locked down tight.

        • TotallyHumanPinkySwear@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          27 days ago

          You are right in that purposefully creating massive traffic to a specific website is most probably against some TOS (I would not go so far as to say illegal). Nevertheless, this is war and my contribution, by itself, is insignificant and remains well under the radar.

          This war is very dear to my heart and I wanted to attract some attention to this tool for people who feel the same.

          • theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            27 days ago

            No, this is not a civil matter or TOS violation. It is a federal crime and felony in the USA under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act.

            So is conspiracy or threat to commit a crime in the CFAA. If you’re in the USA, you should delete this post because it is a federal crime, itself.

            • TotallyHumanPinkySwear@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              27 days ago

              Thank you for your concern. I do not reside in the USA. Certainly, actions that would hinder an oppressive government’s reach would be made illegal, but there is strength in numbers.

              • The Octonaut@mander.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                27 days ago

                There is only strength in numbers (as a defence, which is what you’re positing) if everyone is informed of the consequences of their actions. If they are not, they can blame you for misleading them.

                People aren’t doubting the virtue of your intent but you are speaking very confidently incorrectly about legal matters which doesn’t help your overall appeal.

                • TotallyHumanPinkySwear@lemmy.worldOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  27 days ago

                  It seems so. I guess I do not understand where the many requests/DDoS limit is and the ramifications it may entail in some jurisdictions, although, I explicitly wrote “DDoS” in the title…

                  I had the impression that as a lone actor, lending CPU cycles, you do not fall into the latter category, since the state-sponsored attack, which I support in this instance, is carried out by a different entity.

                  Perhaps, you would even argue that you have plausible deniability when accused of carrying out such attacks, just like the proprietor of a hacked device cannot be held liable (I assume). Definitely good to know.

        • TotallyHumanPinkySwear@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          27 days ago

          I see what you mean. Of course this is most probably “illegal”, but I really do not care about the ramifications the Russian Federation could hold me accountable of, especially since they do not have jurisdiction where I live.

        • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          27 days ago

          It’s also most certainly against the terms of service for your ISP, VPN or VPS, so you could get your service terminated.

          • TotallyHumanPinkySwear@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            27 days ago

            Again, no. Fundamentally, there is no difference in you refreshing a page over and over, the strength comes from the distributed aspect of this attack. There’s no limit on the use of bandwidth and this is no base, by any means, to end a contract.

            Of course, you are free to do as you please, but I am aware of how this works and happy to contribute.

            • theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              27 days ago

              I am aware of how this works

              No, you are absolutely not aware of how this works. This is a blatant felony. Its like thinking you can’t be convicted for murder because there’s nothing “fundamentally” illegal about shooting a gun.

              • TotallyHumanPinkySwear@lemmy.worldOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                27 days ago

                I think there is a misunderstanding: I am not the one carrying out the attack in this instance, I only lend some CPU cycles to a coordinated attack. The bandwidth I contribute is insignificant (I mean… a RPi and the impact to my own services is not noticeable). The attack is only effective with lots of people with the same ideals.

                I think the gun analogy does not really work here: you cannot be held accountable for creating any part of a gun, in case of a murder.

                • slazer2au@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  27 days ago

                  I am not the one carrying out the attack in this instance, I only lend some CPU cycles firearms to a coordinated attack.

                  Intent is the thing you are missing. You know the end result of your actions. That is why this action is illegal in civilised countries.

                  I think the gun analogy does not really work here: you cannot be held accountable for creating any part of a gun, in case of a murder.

                  It absolutely applies, but you are not making the gun are you? You are handing a working firearm with ammo to someone you know will do something illegal.
                  If I borrowed my friends firearm and said I’m going to the range, that is a normal thing. If I said I’m going to Bondi Beach with it, that is a cause for concern and why people get caught up in accessories charges.

                • theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  27 days ago

                  I think the gun analogy does not really work here: you cannot be held accountable for creating any part of a gun, in case of a murder.

                  You’re not making the gun, the programmers that wrote the DDoS program did. You’re firing it.

                  It’s more like, you and a bunch of your friends murder by getting together and flinging the victim with rubber bands until the victim actually dies. Just because all you did was fling a small percentage of the rubber bands and that wouldn’t have killed the victim on your own doesn’t change the fact that you participated in and committed a murder. Legal systems do not have loopholes that allow you to commit crimes like this. They only have loopholes for the ultra wealthy.

  • Decronym@lemmy.decronym.xyzB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    27 days ago

    Acronyms, initialisms, abbreviations, contractions, and other phrases which expand to something larger, that I’ve seen in this thread:

    Fewer Letters More Letters
    IP Internet Protocol
    RPi Raspberry Pi brand of SBC
    SBC Single-Board Computer

    2 acronyms in this thread; the most compressed thread commented on today has 15 acronyms.

    [Thread #77 for this comm, first seen 9th Feb 2026, 07:50] [FAQ] [Full list] [Contact] [Source code]

  • Sims@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    27 days ago

    Wow. At some point you really should use the same amount of energy actually examining what Russia is saying, and thus what is actually happening. Oh well, I guess its just easier to get a fully formed opinion served by propaganda…

    • TotallyHumanPinkySwear@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      27 days ago

      I suppose you could check out their Wiki page, it’s always good to double check that this kind of activity is not counter-productive (that would actually benefit the enemy). In this situation, it seems legit based on everything I’ve seen.

  • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    27 days ago

    It is tribal to block an attack like this if you even manage to make much of a impact at all.

    A better use of your network would be running a Tor node or snowflake proxy. The biggest fear of Putin is that his people will get free access to information. The pen is far greater than the sword.

    • TotallyHumanPinkySwear@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      27 days ago

      Noted, and why not both? Also, the targets are switched often (from what I’ve seen in the logs), so it may be trivial to block, but the service will be temporarily out for the cost of nothing to me.

  • muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    27 days ago

    As much as I like the idea of this, I don’t really have any way to vet this. That’s not where my skills lie. And I live in a country run by fucking morons that want Russia to win this thing anyway so no traffic coming from my country should be considered trusted any more than this.

    While willful participation in a DDOS attack is a literal crime where I live, the greater concern I have is not being able to confirm this does what it says it does and nothing else. We are well beyond the Low Orbit Ion Cannon days.