Yeah. But it kinda defeats the purpose.

The whole point of a VPN is to mix your traffic with tons of other people’s traffic

Please dont do that. Use a link instead. Put the image in the body.

This is a link sharing platform.

RemindMe 10 years

You didn’t count the cost of size and environmental damage.

So basically gmail’s motto: “search. dont sort”

Welcome to Lemmy. We have a link field. Use it.

Using apt, yum, dnf, pacman etc beats flatpak by magnitudes

Flatpaks can be verified. Compare that to apt packaged, which must be cryptographically signed.

That’s why flatpak isnt secure. If you use it, you might end up running malicious code. Because, unlike most Linux repo package managers, it doesn’t require packages to be cryptographically verified as authentic.

Shame they didn’t mention that homebrew is a security nightmare and will happily download maliciously modified code

Edit: omg then the author claims flatpak is better for security?!? It has the same nightmare security issues.

This is definitely the take of someone who learned Photoshop before learning Gimp and doesn’t understand its full capabilities.

Nah, the only reason those tools are used are because of momentum and the fact that most of their new hires have experience with it, also due to momentum.

Ban Photoshop from being taught in schools, and in two generations everyone will say that Photoshop is crap because it takes so long to do anything.

Nah, they work great. The problem is just your generation.

If you learned the other tools first, you would say that adobe suite is clunky, difficult to use, and not suitable for professionals.

Gimp and inkscape both run fine on macOS and Windows.

You can already use gimp and inkscape.

Crypto works. Nobody can break good encryption.

You can make an argument for store now, break after quantum leap or whatever. But, no, if the US wants to spy on the communications of their enemies, they can’t do it by breaking encryption.

Telegram desktop doesn’t support e2ee

If its SMS, they dont need access to your desktop because they can either sniff it on the network or social engineer the provider. SMS is less secure than nothing.

Nah, its less secure with SMS as its frequently used a s a backdoor to replace your first factor.

You do have a choice, email their security team and tell them why you’re closing your account.

Note they’re not encrypted. This is not safe. Dont do it.

Oof, you’re gonna get your account stolen. Never do 2FA over SMS.

You’re gonna want to do this with an app. Phone calls via cell towers are not secure.

Use Wire or Matrix or something.